West Maui Reopening With Harsh Prospects, 3% Occupancy

Maui Turmoil: Mayor’s Contentious “Junket” Amid Rental Cuts, Fire Mishandling

Mayor Bissen’s Japan trip stands in stark contrast to harsh measures planned for the Maui vacation rental market. It paints a picture of an administration that appears out of touch with the needs of residents and visitors. And the proposed 50% reduction in Maui vacation rentals over the next 18 months is a drastic and potentially disruptive change in the Maui tourism landscape.

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Comment policy:
* No political party references.
* No profanity, rudeness, personal attacks, or bullying.
* Hawaii-focused "only."
* No links or UPPER CASE text. English only.
* Use a real first name.
* 1,000 character limit.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

87 thoughts on “Maui Turmoil: Mayor’s Contentious “Junket” Amid Rental Cuts, Fire Mishandling”

  1. “..reduce vacation rentals by 50% within the next 18 months.”

    Those rentals provide income to the people and businesses and taxes to the government. Does the government have a realistic plan to at least replace, dollar for dollar, every lost payroll, business, and tax dollar? Or is it a hope and prayer based on some kind of hate for mainland tourists?

    40
    1. Do anyone of us trust vote counts anymore? I didn’t vote for him nor did many responsible invested resident voters. I will do everything in my power to bring awareness to his ineptness & get him thrown out. Even Hawaiian locals are realizing the damage he is causing that will affect us all. What is hi end game? Will it look like the hotel corps are coming to our rescue or is the mayor truly the scarecrow without a brain? Our governor is the tin man without a heart. What next? These bills will never deliver low income housing. Utility bills alone are can’t be supported with low income, let alone insurance & taxes.

      13
  2. Wow, he’ll probably get voted back in. When will people learn? Maui was awesome. I got to visit 5 times…got married there in ‘08, but…one of our go to restaurants burned down….Aloha Mix Plate closed down since our last visit. The owner of the condo we rented every time has since sold….Kimo’s and Java Jazz is probably the only reason we’d go back…just for the memories. Loved the people and the places…but your mayor has got to go. I bet he had a fun time in Japan. Hopefully Maui makes the best decisions for its future. Would hate to see that place get any worse off.

    23
    1. @Justin R… Just for clarity:
      1. Aloha Mix Plate is open and thriving at it’s original location on Front Street.
      2. Kimo’s is gone.
      3. Java Jazz is open and awesome
      We’d love to see you back on Maui…

      4
  3. I really hate to bring up politics but Hawaii really needs to test-drive another party. They can’t do any worse and I’m sure they’ll do better. The state has nothing to lose.

    50
    1. I hate to say this but I don’t think it has anything to do with party. It’s baked into the culture. Leverage cronies and cultural ties to get yourself elected and then hand out jobs to all your friends and ‘ohana with no regard to competency.

      9
  4. Talk about ‘CYA’, Bisson’s Expense paid trip, follows two by Governor Green (who , along with Maui’s Fire Chief was also out of State on August 7, 2023) already this Spring! What of the Discussions held over the past 10 years over Wind-Fire Mitigation? What of M. Kaleo Manuel? What of Hawaiian Power and Light? What of the former Governor Ige taking Al of the Counties Hotel Tax revenue for the States General Fund? Of all Newspapers, the NYTimes seems to be on the ball as to the cronyism that is part of the One-Party Rule

    29
  5. I haven’t met a awaʻawaʻa loea kālaiʻāina yet who would turn down a free trip. Its in their DNA. Their motto is “Do as I Say, Not as I Do”.

    28
  6. BOH, this is a thoughtful, fair, all-encompassing article. Your efforts in attempting to piece together all of the different moving parts is appreciated. Mahalo!

    16
  7. The more I read, the more I’m convinced that Maui County’s government is irrevocably incompetent at all levels. But the blame lies with us, the voters, who continuously elect people who are manifestly unfit for office. Until that changes, nothing will.

    44
    1. We get the government we deserve. The real problem is that good, competent people aren’t running for office anymore. In this age of deceit and attack politics, who wants to subject themselves to the horrible process of campaigns and money-raising? Until we change the campaign finance and information laws (not likely from the entrenched interests) we will continue to vote in compromised, incompetent hacks.

      3
  8. I respectfully have to disagree. There are a couple of good reasons for going to Japan. If only to foster more Japanese to visit would be worth it alone.
    Much can be learned from the Japanese concerning disaster mitigation. They are really good at putting things back together again.
    Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the Tohoku and January Noto Peninsula earthquakes to name a few.
    These endeavors can only help Maui rebuild.
    Thank you for the article.

    9
    1. Really, comparing atomic bombs wiping out entire cities, hundreds of thousands of displaced people, deaths and injuries. No comparison. The best place to learn would be to have come to California which has had several towns burned to the ground as a result of electric companies failures. I’m sure the regulations in California would be more similar to those in Hawaii. Plus how many delegates do you need to send…20 seems extremely excessive. Can’t wait to see how this helps Maui, hoping and praying it does but considering your government I don’t have much faith in them. Mahalo

      12
  9. Beat of Hawaii has written a very one-sided editorial, ignoring Maui County’s general plan and the best interests of the residents of Maui. Maui’s tourism numbers were way in excess of those allowed by the Maui Island plan and the mayor’s reducing the number of short-term vacation rentals means that he is implementing the plan, unlike any of his predecessors.
    Furthermore he is reducing the vacation rentals and making an effort to convert them to long-term rentals for the many people displaced by the Lahaina fire and for the pent-up demand for housing by Maui residents. Without these measures our young families will continually move away. Congratulations mayor vision for doing your job very well.

    7
    1. Housing in resort areas will never be low income housing. There are real costs. The need is for low income but without jobs not even low income rent will be affordable. 2200 fire victim homes were needed but 7000 STRs are banned. Most of the lost homes were unpermitted, illegal, non or underinsured properties. True subsidized low income housing should have been built without devastating our economy. There is no such thing as a free ride. Locals need to be educated with skills & professions, taught to budget, save & qualify rather than be handed a temporary solution that will cause more damage than it helps.

      12
    2. You’re sadly mistaken if you think your incompetent mayor can force home owners to donate their earnings to support long term renters. If STR’s are denied, owners will only rent to qualified long term renters who can afford to pay rent equivalent to the weeks or months the STR’s would generate. Otherwise, you, the Maui taxpayer, will have to foot the bill for any money handed to long term renters to offset the difference.

      10
    3. Do you realize very few of those “didplaced” families can adequately live in a 1 or 2 bedroom condo whether it’s via rent or purchase and also very few of them are interested in living way over in the Kihei /Wailea area, regardless if they can even afford it along with the HOA dues etc. Additionally the island cannot afford the lost tax revenue the tourists bring in for just the rentals alone. I wish the island well but there’s a loooong road ahead.

      10
      1. The Governor, Mayor and council are working off of charts put out by the Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement. The charts indicate that the vast majority of the displaced are looking for 1 and 2-bedrooms.

        I think the charts are rigged, as it certainly doesn’t seem to be true, judging by the number of displaced who are rejecting them.

        I have seen the charts, and so many of the statistics in them just can’t be right.

        7
        1. PatG,
          Thank you for this explanation. I saw a claim tied to an employee of the Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement. He thinks the loss of STR property taxes, TAT and GET will amount to only 3 -4 % of the County budget, when in reality, GET property taxes alone are 40% of the County budget from property taxes. Now County Council has ordered a $300,000 study to determine the “real” costs. But who will do the Study? The Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement?

          6
          1. Yes, that was another suspicious “statistic. My jaw dropped at some of these charts.

            Here they are, for anyone interested:

            app.helpingmaui.org/data/minastats

          2. Here are more charts for Lahaina property data. You can also view other charts from the CNHA (Council for Native Hawaii Advancement) at this link.

            This conflicting data has a large majority of the properties destroyed being occupied by the owners. I have seen other charts by other organizations showing that 75% of the displaced were renters.

            app.helpingmaui.org/data/prop

            There’s a significant difference between losing one’s home and losing one’s rental, although both are devastating.

            Which one is it?

            3
    4. The vacation rental condos targeted by the mayor are all within a half mile of the beach. That alone puts their value close to a million or more. Secondly, they were built before 1989 (the qualification to be on the Minatoya List). Nearly 50 years old, they need hundreds of thousands of dollars of work. Who pays for that? The owners of the condos, through special assessments and sky-high monthly dues. They will never be affordable housing. Even if they were given away for free, the cost to own would be $5,000 – $10,000 a month, and the rent would reflect that. Bissen is saying what you want to hear, instead of saying the truth: “The government f—ed up, not building affordable housing for our people.”

      5
      1. If the Minatoya units are taken over by long-term landlords (doubtful, but that’s what the powers-that-be are hoping for) the owners will have their HOAs lowered by voting out and deferring needed maintenance, and the units will fall into disrepair.

        Up until now, the Minatoya units have been immaculately maintained because they have to be for short-term visitor use, and also because owners spend time in their units themselves and want their complexes well-maintained.

        Take both the option to short-term rent and owner visits away, and you will end up with sub-par rental housing with the cheapest possible upkeep. It will degrade and devalue the surrounding areas. That’s just the nature of long-term rentals.

        2
  10. The money paid for this junket would have been better spent on the legal fees the County of Maui will incur, now that the Electric company has turned the table on the County and is accusing the County of mismanagement.

    16
  11. “The delegation from Maui was reported by multiple sources to have visited Fukushima to learn how to help Maui recover based on learning from the earthquake-stricken area.”

    Hello? What did the delegation expect to learn? Fukushima is not a place that tourists are greatly attracted to, so nothing about that issue is at play here.

    As far as how the people of Fukishima and the government of Japan are dealing with post-earthquake issues, do not expect Hawaii legislators to learn anything about how to deal with Lahaina. It is apples and oranges and the mindset of the Japanese is far-removed from that of Hawaiians, native or otherwise.

    21
  12. There’s a little app called, “ZOOM”. It helps provide a face-to-face meeting whether across the city, across the country or around the world. At $159.00 for a year for a corporate rate, this would warrant a savings in the tens of thousands and even allow multiple people in attendance at the same time!
    What a concept!!
    Too bad the mayor has not been advised or sought out that little tiny app as a cost saving alternative.
    Optics: Appears it was more about him and his pleasure than his reported duties!
    End Result: Fired!

    18
  13. It seems the trip to Japan was to learn about disaster recovery but this article is trying to tie it to tourism. I’m wondering what took them so long to do this in their recovery planning efforts

    4
  14. Absolutely appalling and disgusting. This guy is totally incompetent and should be recalled immediately from office by the voters. What a disgrace and lack of judgement and respect for the citizens of Maui. Special interest politics at its worst. Vote all these politicians out of office. Hawaii deserves much better than its current clown car government.

    30
  15. I believe 2011 was when the Tsunami wiped out Fukushima due to ocean turbulence caused by an offshore earthquake. The remnants of that Tsunami effected Kona quite badly with more minor damage occurring on the other Hawaiian Islands also.

    3
  16. I think that Mayor’s salary should be attached to tourism. His compensation should be reduced by 25% and is able to get this back if tourism meets the budgeted amount, anything short and he does not get the money. Could work a bonus plan based the amount of tourists dollars generated that exceed budget. Must exceed the budgeted amount by 10%.

    9
    1. This is an interesting concept, but since all of the claims show that by eliminating 50% of the STR, the county will only loose 3-4% in revenue, base his salary on the county’s revenue. If it goes below that 3-4% expected loss, start deducting the same percentage of the loss from his salary. I know I’m not going where I’m not wanted, so he’s lost all of my tax revenue.

      Mike

      1
  17. Once again the old adage is “You get what you vote for” yet the citizens of Hawaii and each of the Islands continue to just vote the same old way and yet strangely Still believe that things will be somehow different! That is the definition of political insanity but no matter what has happened in the past they only believe that voting a straight ticket is the only thing that they can do! Pretty damn sad is what it is and where the equivalency is between Fukushima and Lahaina is totally escapes me considering that they had to deal with a tsunami AND radioactive waste spread by the melt down of several nuclear reactors! Differences with Huge distinctions with no similarities whatsoever!

    22
    1. Not unlike Muriel Bowser, Mayor of DC, going to The Masters last month, and this week to Las Vegas, entourage and all, paid for by Taxpayers! These people don’t get it…………

      7
Scroll to Top