Leave a Comment

Comment policy:
* No political party references.
* No profanity, rudeness, personal attacks, or bullying.
* Hawaii-focused "only."
* No links or UPPER CASE text. English only.
* Use a real first name.
* 1,000 character limit.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

29 thoughts on “Southwest’s New Plans | Boon Or Bane For Hawaii Travel?”

  1. We used to fly Hawaiian or Alaska. Our last trip was on SW. We thought it was as good as the rest. The last HA was on the new 321NEO and that did away with the Hawaiian touch. In fact, the SW flight attendants were more attentive than HA. The seats were great due to the legroom. I would have no problem flying them again. SJC – HNL – LIH – SJC.

    1
  2. Just remember what Southwest’s reps said at the conference…

    “these are the most comfortable of all the options we presented them with”

    give customers options of crap, more crap, – they are going to go with the better crap they can find.

    Alaska Airlines at least came out and said they asked for the most heavily padded version of the Recaro seats.

    1
  3. Mike, without listing specifics, your claim is pretty outrageous and should not have been sent out by BOE.

    1
  4. How many people here who are commenting on Southwest have actually flown SWA to/from Hawai’i? For those of you commenting on either side of the issue, please enlighten us so we can make a better and well rounded decision.

    2
    1. Justin,

      Great question. I think a lot of the negative comments are from those who hate to see any competition for HA (a company that will once again go bankrupt if the merger fails).

      Like HA, my company is tons smaller than my largest competitors. So, I have to promote my strengths and not try to find some govt agency to threaten my big rivals.

      BTW, we almost always fly HA to HNL – my wife likes the music. It’s a fine airline, but no better than the others I’ve flown. And always more expensive.

      1
  5. If you are that high maintenance when flying, southwest isn’t going to be for you. I fly it all the time and it is far and away always an easy experience. The seats are fine, love the A B C organized seating. If you know how it works it is pretty simple. Get in line in order. It’s not that hard. There is nothing confusing about it. Two free checked bags means you don’t have to listen to the gate agents threaten to take your bags from you at the gate. I hope they don’t change a thing. I fly all the airlines and I will always take a SW flight over United or American every time. Flights to Hawaii are still a bargain on SW, just booked my next trip for the Fall. Keep up the good work, Southwest! 🙂

    3
  6. I would rather not go to Hawaii than fly on southwest, especially in those new plastic lawn chairs.

    Ending and starting a trip with a miserable experience and dropping 5 figures in the middle? Nope.

    2
    1. Not to mention the lackluster maintenance performed on their aircraft. If I had to chose between Southwest and swimming, I’d start swimming now.

      1
  7. who cares about legroom when a thinner seat poses lower lumbar back pain. A minimum 6 hour flight from the mainland is probably 3 hours too long. Boarding fees up 400%. Now you know why. If one thing don’t give you a pain in the rear then it’s another. Just add another negative thing to the list. Maybe the added legroom is so your wallet slides out your back pocket with seat reclined so wallet is lost or left behind. Anyone thought of that?

    3
  8. Long flights to Hawaii, especially coming from Indianapolis with at least one layover—South West is not an option I will ever pick. I will pay more for an assigned first-class seat, which is more like Economy was 30 years ago. How I miss the widebody flights that used to fly direct from Chicago. A few may still exist, but pricing keeps me in the pseudo business/first class of the narrow-body flights. Booked 3 weeks for Sept/Oct just yesterday

    1
  9. We flew SWA HNL to OAKto Chicago Midway 21MAY. Two weeks prior I had flown AAL First Class HNL/PHX/ORD and back.

    Having two medium sized kids, my wife and my 74″, 195lb self I was a bit concerned with legroom and seat comfort.

    The plane we flew to Oakland, we deplaned in Oakland and got right back on it 55 minutes later for the leg to Midway. Plane was a four year old 737-8 MAX. No power in the seats. Again, we were a bit concerned.

    We were wrong beyond comprehension. Seats were quite comfortable and I had more legroom than any other airline’s economy cabin, by an easy 1-2 inches.

    We fly back to HNL in a few days. Looking forward to seeing if the return plane is as comfortable.

    $550 roundtrip (plus taxes)

    3
  10. Not sure those SW seats can get anymore uncomfortable for me than they already are. I like the airline. Hate the seats…

    Best regards

  11. Just one more reason not to fly SW. It’s a cattle car with wings and always has been.
    No assigned seating, no real food, terrible legroom, airport gate experience is total chaos. SW is really not the cheapest airline anymore, and just because they have no baggage fees doesn’t make them a bargin. SW is barely tolerable from from DFW to HOU, but will never be acceptable for long flights to Hawaii or anywhere else. Just my opinion, I’ll continue to pass on flying SW.

    6
  12. Wondering how folks with a larger girth will be able to handle a long haul. If the seats are narrower, less padded, and travelers are packed in like sardines, a flight to Hawaii sounds like a nightmare.

    1
    1. On my return trip I flew into LAS and RON’d. Flew out the next day. There were several very large passengers on the flight. 1 of them had purchased two seats. The others (man and wife) were wedged in the standard single seats. Looked less than comfortable. They did get to preboard though.

      Best Regards

  13. Slimline seating has come a long way. When they were first introduced a decade ago, the seat manufacturers really hadn’t worked out the ergonomics, and those seats were pure torture.

    Today’s Recaro offerings are far more ergonomic, despite the lack of extra plush padding. I’ve had no problem enduring 7+ hours in a Recaro seats used by United.

  14. We flew them last year to Kona for the first, and last time. Was a miserable experience to say the least. Almost solely due to the ridiculous cattle herd boarding process, which was compounded because it was done 4x due to stupid connections that aren’t experienced when we have flow Alaskan every trip prior. Leave Ontario, CA to Oakland. Disembark the plane to only re-board 40 minutes later the exact same plane. What sense did that make? Then the return was a joke and again, same connection process in Oakland, but this time we had to switch planes, but they announced “those that are continuing on to Houston, you can remain seated”… We didn’t get that luxury on the departing leg, so the inconsistencies really left a nasty taste.

    3
  15. The bottom line is that if you want to save money on a trip to Hawaii, Southwest is the way to go! The planes are safe. The flight attendants are usually friendly, and I’ve always been comfortable in their planes.

    6
    1. Their planes are not safe. I can tell you stories about the lack of proper maintenance performed on their aircraft

      1
      1. Mike G,

        Please tell the stories so we can learn and make a better informed decision. Please cite references so we can ensure accuracy.

        Mahalo!

  16. Interesting comment in the article about future possible conjecture about a premium or even a “first class” cabin on SWA! I am a Flight Attendant of over 30 years, not with SWA. Although I could possibly see some type of premium cabin, a First Class cabin on SWA has zero chance, at best. Keep in mind their galleys, which I obviously have a ton of experience working in an airplane galley. There is Zero room in a SWA galley for additional supplies, like food and glassware. And, of the 800+ planes SWA flies, Zero have ovens, so the thought of having a hot meal is not going to happen. No way will SWA spend the money taking out seats to make a bigger galley.
    Premium class, maybe, but First Class on SWA, never! That is not a SWA thing!

    3
  17. SWA is ok for flights of under 1.5 hrs…but when I go to Hawaii I want
    comfort. My aging back doesn’t like seats which are not cushioned well, and a nice head/neck rest is a must. I’ll pay extra to fly on a plane that will get me there feeling well. The comfort of a seat sets the tone for the vacation.

    10
  18. These seats are for short or medium haul flights Which hawaii is not. Seems like a very uncomfortable trip.

    9
    1. I live part time in Hawaii and fly back and forth several times a year!
      I only fly Southwest as I’m a baby boomer and don’t sleep on night flights! Love day flights on SW and I think their nice seats are wider and spacier than most airlines

      3
  19. BOE,

    Without any other changes, how many additional seats will be possible with the Recaro seats?

    Mahalo,
    Rod

    2
    1. Hi Rod.

      Perhaps up to two rows, max. But SW says they aren’t changing the seat pitch, which is part of what makes no sense.

      Aloha.

      2
      1. Two more rows = a lot of revenue.

        As to the pitch, perhaps they accomplish that by making each seat a tad shorter in the butt area.

        Hope it works out. I don’t fly SWA much, but I’ve always had a good experience. One day, we may take SWA to Hawaii. For now, my wife wants HA because she says it’s more “Hawaiian.” I have enough Delta miles for First Class and I think I’ll burn them on one of my 2 upcoming flights to HNL.

        Mahalo for the information!!!
        Rod

        1
Scroll to Top