It has been a while since Beat of Hawaii editors have had the chance to fly a couple of aircraft that have both taken on new importance in the ever-evolving saga of Alaska Airlines’ purchase of Hawaiian Airlines and the imminent integration under a single airline operating certificate this fall.
The outbound, on a Thursday night, was Hawaiian Airlines’ 9-year-old A330-200 in first class from Honolulu to Seattle. The return, just three days later on Monday evening, was on Alaska’s 17-year-old 737-800 in exit-row economy.
BOH editors never know how these reviews will turn out, but if asked beforehand, we would have said Hawaiian would win hands down. Recent reader comments about Alaska’s service from Hawaii aficionados have often been less than favorable, so expectations were already low.
What happened on Thursday night aboard Hawaiian, and then on Monday night with Alaska, left the editors just as surprised as anyone reading this. As a point of reference, we always pay for anything we review, including these flights, in full.
These flights ultimately resulted in a highly interesting back-to-back comparison. On paper, a widebody lie-flat seat in first class should easily outshine a narrowbody economy seat. In reality, the gap between them was not just literally narrow. On some points, it flipped completely.
Fare and value.
Our one-way journey in Hawaiian’s A330 first class from Honolulu to Seattle cost 70,000 miles per person, which we value at roughly $700. While not the best redemption value ever seen, nor the best price, it felt fair given the lie-flat seat, meal service, and overall comfort on an overnight Hawaii-to-mainland flight.
For the return, we opted for three exit-row seats on Alaska’s 737-800. We refer to that as our 3-seat trick, and it always provides a great comfort alternative. Those cost 35,000 miles each for a total of 105,000 miles, worth about $1,050 in our valuation, or a total of $525 per passenger. Some may argue Alaska miles hold more value, but in any event, this was an acceptable price for extra legroom and an incredibly comfortable economy experience.
Check-in and customer service.
Check-in for the Hawaiian flight in Honolulu was quick and uneventful, and obtaining boarding passes was seamless. The counter was staffed, there was no wait, and bags were tagged without delay. Boarding at the gate in the still-new Mauka Terminal at HNL, Gate 6, was well organized, and first class boarded through a dedicated door.
Check-in for the return on Alaska was far less straightforward. Both of us had issues with the Alaska Airlines app. The reservation appeared on both the website and the app, but when it was time to check in, select meals, or access boarding passes, the system repeatedly refused and instructed a visit to an agent at the airport. That was an anomaly in our experience, but it nevertheless prevented a better start.
In Seattle, the helpful and friendly agent could not explain the problem either. She was unsure if it was related to booking three exit-row seats or something else entirely. Either way, it required a manual process to complete the check-in.
Additionally, editor Jeff’s Alaska Mileage Plan number was included in the reservation but did not integrate with his TSA PreCheck. That required another trip back to the agent to get an updated boarding pass with that included.
The Seattle airport itself was very busy and quite chaotic, with large crowds and ongoing construction, making for a far less pleasant start to the journey compared with Honolulu’s smooth experience.


Cabin and aircraft condition.
We had not flown Hawaiian’s A330-200 since last fall, and frankly, we remembered it somewhat more fondly than what we encountered this time. At just nine years old, the aircraft should have felt relatively fresh, yet it seemed well past its prime.
The first class Optimares lie-flat seats were visibly worn and frayed in multiple places, and the padding was uncomfortable for an overnight flight. The seat remains uncomfortable and non-standard for lie-flat use, especially for those who are not short.
The soft product was equally disappointing. The blanket was the thinnest, most threadbare airline blanket we can ever remember, and even the flight attendants seemed embarrassed to hand it out. The minimal pillow was no better, flat and worn to the point of being useless.
Hawaiian also provided a small amenity kit, but instead of a fabric pouch, it came in a plain paper sleeve that looked more like fast-food packaging than first class. It was a striking contrast to the elegant new amenity kits we have recently received in United’s Hawaii first class.
From the bathrooms to the overhead bins, everything looked surprisingly dated and tired. The plane rattled noticeably during takeoff, adding to the impression that this was not the same polished A330 we had flown countless times before.
By contrast, Alaska’s 17-year-old 737-800 felt like it was in far better shape. The first-class seats looked newly installed, and even in economy, the seats featured fresh, modern upholstery. The carpeting seemed new, and the cabin carried that recently refreshed feel, whether from actual refurbishment or simply better upkeep. The only visible sign of age was the heavily scratched windows, a sure giveaway of an aircraft’s years in service.
The overhead bins remained the older style (similar to the A330) rather than the newer, larger pivot bins. However, overall, the Alaska cabin felt well-maintained and, in many ways, presented better than Hawaiian’s newer widebody. The lavatory was a pleasant surprise, not one of the cramped mini designs seen on the 737 MAX aircraft, but a full-size version in good condition.


Food and beverage.
With a departure just before midnight on the Hawaiian flight, the timing of the meal service felt at odds with the menu. Service began around 12:30 a.m., starting with an Asian tofu noodle salad. Entrée options included a spicy lasagna, which seemed like an odd and heavy choice for the middle of the night, and a chicken sandwich.
The food was uninspired and, aside from being edible, offered nothing more. Beverage selection was standard, and service was attentive and consistent with Hawaiian’s traditional style.
Alaska’s economy service included a quality snack mix, Maui Monk mini pretzel braids, along with two cans of beverages per passenger, ice in cups, and a packet of True Lemon for a nice twist. For an economy cabin, it was above the bare minimum and felt a step up from what is often expected domestically. Service was repeated later in the flight.
Crew interaction.
The Hawaiian crew was warm, approachable, and genuinely kind, with the friendly, familiar demeanor we have for decades associated with the airline. It was clear they were doing their best under what seemed to be the challenging circumstances of the airline having been sold. They remained highly attentive, including with beverages, but the overall onboard product still did not match their efforts or our previous experiences.
From boarding to landing, Alaska’s crew delivered exceptional, even surprising service. Passengers were greeted warmly, and the captain walked up and down the aisle before departure, engaging in personal conversations throughout the cabin, which were primarily centered on the destination of the flight.
The exit-row flight attendant introduced herself and delivered the safety briefing in a warm and professional manner. The combination of unusually personable interactions and proactive attention made this economy flight a standout, even compared to Hawaiian’s first class.
Extras, comfort, and wi-fi.
Hawaiian impressed once again with its Starlink Wi-Fi, which worked gate-to-gate and was fast enough for real-time work and streaming. It connected as soon as boarding began and remained reliable throughout the flight to its conclusion.
On Alaska, Wi-Fi was available for $8, which we purchased and shared via mobile hotspot. While the speed test was tricky to run, performance was at least adequate, though not impressive, with only a couple of brief dropouts during the flight.
For crossing the Pacific, where Alaska’s Wi-Fi service has often been spotty or absent, it was a significant improvement that made it possible to work the entire flight, including drafting this review.
Overall impressions and takeaway.
This trip offered a rare, even for us, back-to-back look at Hawaiian’s A330 first class and Alaska’s 737-800 in exit-row economy. While they are different products aimed at different markets, the contrast was striking and not always in the way we had expected.
Hawaiian still delivers on the warmth of its people. The crew was gracious and attentive, the kind of hospitality that feels personal when you live in Hawaii. But the hard product and soft touches have slipped far. The A330 cabin felt tired and dated, the Optimares lie-flat seats no longer measure up to industry standards, and the catering was uninspired. Even basic items like blankets, pillows, and amenity kits fell short of what should be a premium overnight experience.
We are pleased to learn that Alaska plans to completely refurbish the A330 fleet interiors, which will significantly enhance the physical product.
The long-anticipated Hawaiian Dreamliner will not be the answer for Hawaiian passengers much longer. By the time we fly it in October, it will already be in its final days in Hawaiian livery. After that, it will operate under Alaska Airlines’ own branding.
That means the real hope for an improved premium experience lies in Alaska’s planned multi-year refurbishment of this A330 fleet inherited from Hawaiian. If those upgrades deliver on promises, as we anticipate will be the case, including a new first/business cabin, a true premium economy section, and possible improvements in standard economy, the A330 could regain its standing as a competitive long-haul aircraft.
Alaska, on the other hand, surprised us on this trip. The 17-year-old 737-800 appeared refreshed and presented better than the newer A330. The crew, from the captain walking the aisle to the in-our-experience unusually personable flight attendants, offered some of the best service we have experienced in domestic economy.
Small touches like quality snacks, generous beverage service, reasonable Wi-Fi, and genuine engagement made a difference. Comfort-wise, the Alaska exit-row seat was more pleasant for sitting than the Hawaiian lie-flat was for sleeping, which says something about how far behind Hawaiian’s A330 seats have fallen.
If this trip taught anything, it is that good service can transcend cabin class, and an aging hard product can drag down even the friendliest crew. Hawaiian’s brand of hospitality still matters, but until the A330 retrofit arrives, the premium cabin remains stuck in the past, while parent company Alaska’s economy unexpectedly gave it a run for the money.
We invite your comments on both airlines. Mahalo!
Lead Photo by Beat of Hawaii showing an Alaska pilot talking to passengers before departure.
Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News
Alaska is the class of mainland/domestic carriers right now. Incredibly valuable mileage program, great domestic first experience, modern and clean planes, pleasant staff from phone to plane, timely arrivals, and reasonable fares. I hope they’re able to revitalize Hawaiian as they’ve proven themselves pretty shrewd at making money. Just wish they had a larger route network and in-flight entertainment. The expansion will be fascinating
Your A330 experience and impressions are the same as mine last year on HA. Hope things will improve with the upcoming overhauls.
Best Regards
Not surprising given how Hawaiian’s once excellent Premium Product has been steadily slipping since even before the Pandemic. Only mistake you made with Alaska is not ordering their Cheese/Cracker/Fruit plate which is kind of legendary among US Airlines.
I’m already on record as saying one of the worst flights I took so far in 2025 was PDX-HNL on Hawaiian. Old A330 interior, uncomfortable seats (even in Premium Class) and tasteless food. The FA’s seemed uninterested in representing the brand (maybe because the merger was going through against their wishes). I was told of a plan to “redo the interiors soon.” BOH nails it again. However, Hawaiian redeemed themselves HNL -AUK on the Dreamliner. Whole different ballgame. Best flight of 2025. Fantastic equipment, crew, food, comfort, and in-flight care. It will be sad to see Dreamliner’s leave HNL – fewer chances of riding on one.
Maybe Alaska’s “Aloha” isn’t too shabby after all !
Never quite understood the possibly over romanticized impression of HA … Sure, ‘Pualani’ on the tail is enticing as is flight crew’s uniforms, boarding music & that Honolulu cookie is tasty but when it’s all said and done it’s just a more/less typical US airline flight. Admittedly I actually only took one West Coast flight, but put me on any airliner heading to paradise and I’m a happy camper no matter how they treat me ! … lol
re: Alaska vs Hawaiian service & aircraft
I flew AS (for the first time) SEA-HNL and had pre-ordered a cheeseburger in economy. Was delicious, best in-flight food in a long time. This was early December, 2023. Last flight of the day. Plane not crowded, excellent service.
Meanwhile, we have flown between HNL and SYD on Hawaiian repeatedly over the past 12 years. Flew the route three times in the last 18 months. Sadly, their extra legroom seat fabrics are becoming quite worn and frayed while hard surfaces are rather tired and scuffed. Complimentary meals were minimally acceptable for economy class international travel. Next trip, probably Qantas.
Well, no real surprises here for me. I flew Hawaiian’s A330 out of SAN in May, and got the same impression as BoH. Tired, dated and way overdue for a refurb. Almost felt like 1st Class wasted. Good to hear that AS is on the move to provide good service. I can see why HA would not spend money on the A330, seeing as how AS is going to take the 330s and put them on international service.
I’m flying back to Maui/HNL next April, wonder what it will be like them?
I flew OGG-SEA last week on AS after AA to PHX was “delayed” about 20 hours.
I was pleasantly surprised at the team work and friendliness on Alaska. I primarily use Hawaiian inter island and AA to the mainland. The Hawaiian crew openly admits to worries about what’s next.
AA is terrible.
We fly Alaska a lot and have begun to prefer the exit rows in economy. One prime row, and I forget the plane model, had only two seats so I really had legroom. But the most fun, to me, of the exit row seats, is when the attendant at the gate, asks as we board, “Traveling with anyone under 15?” (I am on the downside of 70). My answer is “Just my wife”. They chuckle, she hits me, and we board the plane.
This guy was the pilot yesterday SEA to LIH!!!
Nice article, I’m also not surprised by the article’s conclusion because as an Alaska elite for years I recently flew Hawaiian FC and Extra Comfort from PDX to HNL round trip and was disappointed by the product compared to Alaska’s product and service. From BOH comments where Hawaiian fans bash Alaska, I don’t understand what the complaints were about because I found that Hawaiian was subpar to what I am used to on Alaska flights. I have a trip booked on Hawaiian’s 787 this fall and look forward to trying it.
Not a surprise. We fly the A330 from LA to Hawaii and back, and book very early to get extra comfort seats in the small section between 1st class and the main cabin. There’s only about 12 seats there in total and we get corner seats. While the little section is great, the seats and plane in general is dated. Kinda fraying at the edges. Hawaiian badly needs a true premium economy section. As an example, we’ll almost certainly switch to Delta or any other airline that has a real premium economy section versus Hawaiian’s A330, at least until Alaska gets its act together and really refurbishes them.
I get the point, but first class is still first class. I’ll take a lie-flat over an exit row any day, even if it’s worn. Overnight flights are about sleep, and you’re not getting that in coach.
Understood. If I was flying from the right coast, I’d want a lyflat seat too, but as a left coast person, it is not really needed. Just depends on where you are flying from, which governs your perspective.
Living here, I want Hawaiian to succeed, but they’ve been coasting on reputation. If Alaska can keep their service standards high while improving the A330s the same time, it could be a win for all of us.
Never thought I’d read a review from you guys where economy beat first class, even if it’s a different airline. Makes me wonder if comfort is less about the class and more about the care that goes into the product.
As someone who’s flown Alaska in exit row a dozen times, I’m not shocked. They nail the basics, and that goes a long way. Hawaiian’s soft product is great, but the hard product is overdue for refresh.
I’ve flown Hawaiian first class for years and used to think it was unbeatable. Your review really hit home as my last trip felt tired too. I’m hoping Alaska’s refurb plan is more than just talk.
I’m still trying to find out why a first class ticket from Portland to Maui is being charged for both ways. I thought round trip was one fare but they are charging for both ways.
Once you add it to your cart it will be one fare, but Alaska has always priced it by segments. I’d call Customer Care if you’re still confused by it 1-800-252-7522 (1-800-ALASKAAIR).
In the Alaska exit row did the arm rests flip up or were they fixed – as they usually are on United wide body flights? Unless they flipped up and you could actually stretch across several seats, not sure what the third extra seat bought you.
Hi Kkeoki.
They are movable.
Aloha.
Hi Jeff and Rob,
This was an interesting read. Like you, I hope the A330 refurb will give Hawaiian back the premium feel. We really prefer the twin aisle big planes when we can get them and keep checking our reservations to be sure we are still on one for our next Hawaii trip this fall. It was good to hear you got a warm feeling from the Alaska crew as some of the recent comments from others made me hesitant about our next Alaska flights. I am left curious how your experience might have been on a 737 MAX rather than the older, more spacious 737-800. Aren’t many of the Hawaii flights on Alaska on MAXs now?
Thanks!
Jerry
@jerry – from PDX it’s now all Hawaiian metal A321 or A330. I would rather fly the 737 Max vs A321, Alaska Recaro seats are more comfortable and all have USB and power outlets.
Thanks @Trav503,
I hadn’t thought about the MAX vs the A321 but of course I might need to when I can’t get a larger plane. Surprised really to hear the MAX was better but the the seats themselves are the most important part!
Jerry