When we first stepped aboard Hawaiian Airlines’ Dreamliner before it entered passenger service, it felt like the beginning of an entirely new chapter for Hawaii travel. We followed the aircraft through years of delays, its long-awaited arrival, and our first impressions onboard.
We flew it in first class from Los Angeles to Honolulu just before it left that route last year, and followed the merger that changed where many of us thought the Dreamliner would spend its future.
That’s why this latest schedule change stood out to us. During the Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday periods, one daily Seattle-Maui flight is scheduled to be operated by the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. The aircraft now wears Alaska Airlines colors. Just what that means for the people actually sitting in it is the part most travelers have not caught quite yet.
Hawaiian Dreamliner returns to Maui for holiday travel.
The Dreamliner is scheduled to operate one daily Seattle-Kahului roundtrip from November 20 through November 30 and again from December 17 through January 4. Aircraft assignments can always change, but for now, the schedule puts the Dreamliner back on a Hawaii route after many travelers assumed it had largely moved on.
For visitors planning a Maui trip during those periods, the assignment offers another opportunity to fly an aircraft that Hawaiian spent years developing before it entered passenger service in 2024. It also continues a story we’ve been following from the day Hawaiian announced its Dreamliner plans.
Hawaiian 787 Dreamliner cabin still feels Hawaiian despite the new Alaska livery.
The most obvious difference is the paint, and there is no mistaking that once the airplane pulls up to the gate. Alaska’s livery has replaced Hawaiian’s familiar branding.
Step onboard, however, and the experience is still remarkably familiar. The Leihoku Suites remain in place, the cabin design is still the one Hawaiian created, which we walked through with Hawaiian’s executive team the week the first aircraft arrived in Honolulu. Alaska has not yet begun the larger interior changes it has signaled for the fleet, including the true premium economy cabin many travelers still want but Hawaiian never installed.
For now, passengers board an Alaska airplane while spending most of the flight inside an aircraft that still feels largely Hawaiian. That makes these Maui flights something more special than an ordinary seasonal aircraft change.
Dreamliner 3-3-3 economy seating remains the biggest debate among Hawaii travelers.
From the beginning, our readers agreed on many of the Dreamliner’s strengths. The quieter cabin, larger windows, lower cabin altitude, and modern design all earned praise from travelers who had waited years to experience the new aircraft.
The biggest debate centered on the economy seating instead. Hawaiian replaced the Airbus A330’s popular 2-4-2 layout with the Dreamliner’s 3-3-3 configuration, and many readers immediately noticed the tradeoff between a newer aircraft and the A330’s more comfortable seating arrangement.
Some appreciated the newer aircraft enough that the seating change didn’t matter. Others said they would gladly choose the older A330 because of its wider seats and fewer middle seats. Every Dreamliner article we’ve published has reminded us that the discussion is far from settled.
Hawaiian 787 Dreamliner future on Hawaii routes stays uncertain under Alaska.
When Alaska and Hawaiian combined, many readers assumed the Dreamliner would quickly disappear from Hawaii flying altogether. Instead, what has changed most so far is the branding, while much of the passenger experience remains the one Hawaiian spent years designing and introducing.
We know that won’t last forever, with future cabin modifications expected as Alaska continues integrating the fleet. For now, however, those changes have not arrived.
Until then, these seasonal Maui flights represent something we didn’t expect to see. The airplane Hawaiian built to define its future is flying Hawaii routes once again, even if it now does so in Alaska colors. For those of us who followed this airplane from its inception, that return, however brief, is worth noting.
Would you book the Dreamliner for your next Hawaii trip despite the 3-3-3 economy seating, or would you still rather fly Hawaiian’s Airbus A330 with its familiar 2-4-2 layout?
By Rob and Jeff, Beat of Hawaii.
Some of the most meaningful parts of Hawaii are the ones visitors walk right past without knowing they are there. We’ve spent nearly 20 years finding them firsthand for BOH as full-time Hawaii residents reporting on travel, culture, and island life, and telling you what they mean for your trip. Join us →
Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News







I would only fly the Dreamliner if I booked first class. (That is how I did it previously). But I would not travel it with the 3-3-3 as long as the A330 (2-4-2) is an option.
I love the A330 so much that I’m willing to have a layover in HNL so my long travel leg is just a 2 seat configuration.
I would always choose the A-330 over the Dreamliner because of the seating configuration alone. Last year, we took the A-330 to New Zealand, then back from Australia. It was great! I despise 3-3-3 seating.
Totally agree with you Alex! The 3-3-3 seating in economy is a deal breaker, and having no dedicated Premium Economy makes it even more so. This 3-3-3 economy seating was a stupid decision by HA executives before the merger.
Aloha to all.
Prefer the 2-4-2 layout.
Regarding the 3-3-3 seating on the 787, my wife and I would both prefer the 2-4-2 seating of the A330. I understand the economics that drives the decision, but the leg and elbow room are nice, at least in the current Extra Comfort Hawaiian A330. There was a day (pre-Alaska) when Hawaiian announced the 787 would make a few flights LAX-OGG and I booked two tickets for that first 787 route. Then many weeks later, it was quietly changed back to the A330 and I quietly changed our flight date.
We flew one of the Alaska/Hawaiian B787’s from Seattle to Rome and back in May-June and were very happy with the aircraft and flights. We really like the 6,000 foot cabin altitude on the 787 rather than the 8,000 foot cabin on most other airplanes. Though I would prefer 2-4-2 seating, I would take 3-3-3 on the 787 over 2-4-2 on the A330. The Airbus A380 also has a 6,000 foot cabin and we’ve flown it between SFO and London on BA twice; also a good ride on the upper deck with 2-4-2 seating. Our flight to Rome (originating in San Francisco on an Alaska B737) was 3 weeks after they started service to Rome and our return was a month later. We usually fly between the Bay Area and Lihui on an Alaska B737 and are fine with it.
The Alaskan plan is to eliminate the Hawaiian brand. To reduce negative publicity they flew the Dreamliner elsewhere for a season. Alaska branding is replacing Hawaiian- Deal with it.