Review: United Airlines Hawaii Economy/Economy Plus. Finding Comfort In The Friendly Skies.

Shrinking Legroom On Hawaii Flights: Winners and Losers

Exploring passenger comfort choices on Hawaii flights in economy. How important is more legroom to your pick?

Continue reading

Leave a Comment

Comment policy:
* No profanity, rudeness, personal attacks, or bullying.
* Hawaii focused only. General comments won't be published.
* No links or UPPER CASE text. English please.
* No duplicate posts or using multiple names.
* Use a real first name, last initial.
* Comments edited/published/responded to at our discretion.
* Beat of Hawaii has no relationship with our commentors.
* 750 character limit.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

41 thoughts on “Shrinking Legroom On Hawaii Flights: Winners and Losers”

  1. Leg room is mandatory for our flights from LA to Hon.
    Not being able to rest our legs (feet and calf area) is detrimental to our health. Affects leg circulation, creates swelling and days to get back walking normally. Already negatively affecting our vacation time. Will not book with any airlines with the lack of this feature.

  2. I will upgrade to Economy Plus whenever it is available. The additional room from the increased pitch makes a difference in comfort.

  3. Being tall and a big guy, leg room is everything. I fly back and forth from LV to Hi on business multiple times a year, and being cramed into a seat isn’t a fun experience. Paying or getting upgrades to extra comfort seats are great, but, not alway possible. Economy is okay, but, we all feel pretty pinned into our seats.

  4. Oh Me Oh My Oh Oh Oh! I am a very tall female. I ignorantly scheduled my flight based on the shortest time. Unfortunately, first the flight was cancelled due to the fires, then after rescheduling, it has been changed 4 times by the airlines and each time the seats were changed by said airlines and unable to pick my seats. soooo, unable now to even change airlines and stuck with my a320neo flights ……should i even go after all the now Greene fiasco going on. I hate throwing away hard earned money, but it may come down to just forgetting the flight. It has been so much stress and work on this vacation plan and now to think about my bad knees in a short seat for hours…is…..just toooooo much.

    1
  5. Is it possible to complain about this to the FAA or NTSB? With the seat pitch being so small is this contributing to more passenger rage? It is bad enough that the airlines are charging so much and giving so little. Is the flying public being price gouged for profit?

    4
  6. It was 53 inches on a tape measure from backrest to seatback over seat cussion. That was a safety feature, properly bucked-in passengers should be able to double over lap with room for head not to impact seatback during anticipated hard or crash landing. The order was to “Assume the crash position” without the sufficient headroom, there needs to be a pilot’s style lap and shoulder harness, I think four point seat belt. But that’s still with distance between seatback and knees even so at no extra cost, and more distance for passengers with longer legs, also at no extra cost. If they don’t want the legs, they don’t want the passengers, because passengers have legs.

    4
  7. I’ve always loved flying Hawaiian, but I’m a guy with long legs, and I need legroom! So my next flight is going to be on southwest. I hope it will be a good experience.

    3
  8. Profit, profit, profit. Maybe flying is getting to be an unjustified expense??? As a person whose first flight on a commercial airliner dates to the early 60s, I remember cloth covered wide and comfortable seats, plenty of leg room and served real food. Flight attendants (then called ‘stewardesses’) were all female (the purser, if a long flight, was usually male) in their twenties, and the aircraft were a mix of jets and props.

    Now we fly faster, cramped into seats that larger persons can barely tolerate, and if food is served, the dog would turn it down. This is progress? Airlines compete these days via ‘fares’, not ‘service’, which used to be their ‘bragging points’. Flying isn’t ‘fun’ anymore, it’s an ‘endurance’.

    6
    1. The old days of flying were good except the harassment of flight attendants. It’s still rough on the females, but more harassers, “pursuers” do get contained and male flight attendants can be helpful in causing respect onboard. “Fun” is supposed to be for everyone, not just some men who fly. If ever we go back to anything from the old days of flying, I hope all men will learn to appreciate flying itself and let people work. Your flight attendants were and still are for your safety, not for your fantasies. They need the credit due for their smarts, training and the extra services of foods, drinks and items they conveniently offer.

      1
    2. Have you checked the cost of a ticket in constant dollars since the early 1960’s?

      If you want to pay early 1960’s fares in constant dollars, you can get a 1960’s experience.

Scroll to Top