Alaska Airlines unveiled ten new route announcements today, signaling further expansion of its network and solidifying its Hawaii strategy by being a dominant West Coast and Pacific connector. However, direct Hawaii routes were noticeably absent from this update. But Hawaii was not left out even still. The company also announced an interesting combined airfare sale (below) that is yet another first.
For travelers to Hawaii, these might at first raise eyebrows—but the implications for Hawaii travel are far more significant than they appear on the surface. With Alaska’s recent acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines, every route update and airfare sale impacts Hawaii flights, especially as the Seattle hub becomes the linchpin for mainland-to-Hawaii travel.
Alaska’s focus on strengthening its mainland network may seem disconnected from Hawaii.
But it’s anything but unrelated. With Seattle firmly established as Alaska’s primary hub, the airline is already building out routes that enhance its ability to funnel traffic from across the mainland to and from Hawaii.
This also suggests that Hawaii travelers could see fewer direct flights and more routing through Seattle—a shift that would be convenient for some but frustrating for others.
Longtime Hawaii visitors and residents have grown accustomed to Hawaiian Airlines’ widebody comfort and direct albeit limited routes, but Alaska’s narrower 737s and hub-focused approach may signal a different future.
Recent BOH reader comments reflect this growing concern. Rob T commented, “Hawaiian is moving widebody flights to the Seattle Hub. The ‘synergy’ that results is that West Coast flyers will be routed through the Seattle hub instead of nonstop flights.” Another reader, Denise, shared frustration, saying, “Sitting in a cramped 737 for five or six hours to Hawaii just isn’t the same. If this is the future of Hawaii travel, it’s disappointing and frustrating.”
New deals through Honolulu.
As Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines align their networks, travelers can already see tangible benefit attempts, including promotional fares that reflect their expanded connectivity. One such example is a $390 each-way fare sale to Sydney and Auckland via Honolulu. Starting in either Seattle or Portland and available for purchase through Nov. 21, 2024. it shows how the airlines are beginning to leverage Honolulu as a central hub for Pacific connections from their west coast hubs.
While such fares are promotional, they underscore the value of Alaska’s acquisition for travelers, creating opportunities that weren’t as accessible before. For those eyeing future travel, this marks a shift in how Hawaii flights are integrated into broader networks, offering travelers not just a way to paradise but also a springboard to global destinations.
Fewer future direct flights to Hawaii?
Hawaiian Airlines’ flights have long been marked by their nonstop convenience from the gateway cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Sacramento, Long Beach, Ontario, Oakland, San Jose, Seattle, Portland, Las Vegas, Phoenix, New York City, and Boston.
Alaska’s network changes suggest that while the total number of Hawaiian flights may remain stable, passengers could face changes ahead including Seattle connections.
On the positive side, Alaska is fast strengthening its ability to connect passengers from various parts of the mainland to its Seattle hub, which will increasingly becoming a cornerstone for Hawaii-bound traffic. Some examples (from today’s announcement) are traveling from Colorado ski resorts to Hawaii and between Hawaii and Central America. These could have previously been a multiple-airline situation that will not be served directly by the combined Alaska/Hawaiian.
Reader Greg highlighted this issue, saying, “Seattle is being prioritized, but that means passengers from the West Coast will lose the nonstop connections they’re used to. It’s hard to feel like this is an upgrade.”
Narrow-body aircraft replace widebody comfort.
One of the biggest shifts Hawaii travelers may see is gradually replacing widebody aircraft with narrowbody planes like Alaska’s 737. Hawaiian Airlines, before the merger, was known for its use of Airbus A330 widebodies on many mainland routes, offering more spacious cabins and what is, to many, a more comfortable travel experience.
Alaska Airlines, by contrast, has a fleet dominated by Boeing 737s—smaller, more economical planes that lack the space and amenities of widebody counterparts. That being said, Hawaiian also relies on its narrow-body A321neo fleet, which has the same issues passengers bemoan.
Tammy S, a frequent traveler, shared her experience, “I’ve flown both Alaska’s 737 and Hawaiian’s A330 from Seattle to Hawaii. The A330 is a much better experience. Narrowbodies just don’t compare for these long-haul flights.” Meanwhile, John H noted the operational challenges, saying, “Widebody planes are great for comfort, but they take up too much gate space in Seattle, which is already congested.”
This trend highlights Alaska’s savvy, cost-focused approach. While narrow-bodies are more economical to operate, passengers will feel the difference—especially on flights that stretch six hours or longer. For Hawaii’s tourism-driven economy, this could subtly affect how visitors perceive the overall Hawaii travel experience.
BOH editors encounter the challenges of long-haul narrow-body.
Yesterday, we returned to Hawaii from California on a 737 MAX 8. We both found the experience lacking, even in extra legroom economy using the third empty seat trick. The long lines queueing for the two lavatories on the United plane made for a miserable six hours in the air. We note, however, that Alaska and United provide one extra lav on their MAX 9 fleet, which is admirable.
Route implications for Hawaii travel.
Today’s announcements underscore Alaska Airlines’ growing influence over West Coast and Hawaii flights, even when Hawaii isn’t explicitly mentioned. Seattle’s role as a hub means Hawaii-bound passengers from across the mainland may face more reliance on connecting flights rather than the direct routes they’ve come to expect.
This has pros and cons: while it opens up far more connections between cities and Hawaii, it also increases travel time and reduces convenience.
Bill A commented, “It’s clear Alaska isn’t going to invest in widebody planes for Hawaii. They’re sticking with their 737s, and that’s going to leave a lot of us passengers unhappy.”
Meanwhile, some readers pointed out potential positives. John W remarked, “Adding widebody flights to Seattle could create more one-stop options for Hawaii travelers, even if direct flights are reduced.” Others, like Chris, noted that Boeing’s production delays may force Alaska to hold on to Hawaiian’s Airbus planes for longer than expected, potentially preserving some of the widebody comfort for now.
What’s up next for Hawaii flights comes on December 10.
Alaska Airlines’ next investor meeting on December 10 is expected to shed significant light on its Hawaii strategy. Key questions remain unanswered:
-Will Alaska keep Hawaiian’s A330s in service for existing routes or phase them into new routes?
-How will the Seattle hub evolve to handle increased Hawaii traffic, especially during peak travel seasons and with a lack of widebody terminal space?
-And perhaps most critically, how will these changes affect pricing and convenience for Hawaii travelers?
As this transition unfolds, Hawaii air travel is entering uncharted new territory. Alaska Airlines’ focus on efficiency and Seattle centrality may streamline operations, but the changes come with trade-offs for comfort and direct access. For now, travelers should prepare for more layovers and narrower planes, even as Alaska works to maximize its reach to Hawaii.
Reader David captured the mixed sentiments many feel: “We’ll get to Hawaii one way or another, but it’s clear things won’t be the same. Hopefully, Alaska will figure out how to balance efficiency with the unique experience of flying to paradise.”
What are your thoughts on the combined efforts of Alaska & Hawaiian?
Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News
I guess every flight landing and leaving Sea/Tac will endure an extra landing/takeoff federal airport runway tax fee added to their airline ticket. This should make future flights a little more expensive for everyone.
I really don’t like going through SeaTac. There was a direct Bellingham Honolulu flight years ago and it was great! Then there was a direct Paine field Honolulu flight. Both have been canceled, so you are forced to go through SeaTac which adds at least three hours and stress to the ordeal.
We have travelled Hawaiian Airlines for the last 20years. The 2 things we enjoyed were direct flights from Cailf and Vegas airports. We make it a priority to book our travel on one of the wide bodies jets.
We have never flown a Alaska flight that connected through Seattle that has not been delayed or terminal changed at the last minute. It also adds 2.5 hours to 3 plus hours to our travel time. If Alaska does away with its Hi. direct flights from Cailf and Vegas, we will no longer be using them. It will be time to travel on United Delta or America
Don’t hear or read much of anything about Hawaiian’s AUS/HNL nonstop? They’ve been flying it 4X a week. I’ve used it a few times since the Covid pandemic. The A330 Is very comfortable and tail winds usually chop a good hour off the 8 hour flight both ways.
Figured that eventually the new 787s would be used on this route. Now I’m wondering if Alaska is going to take delivery of the remaining 787s Hawaiian ordered? Have BOH editors heard anything about both matters in question? For protection due to uncertainty, we’ve booked United first class through SFO for our late January trip.
Aloha to all.
The western US expansion and the Seattle/Portland to Australia/New Zealand announcements are not really related.
The western US expansion was announced before and this release was just a reminder on the upcoming service.
The Pacific Northwest to Australia/New Zealand was aim at SEA and PDX. It was highlighting Alaska’s new ability with Hawaiian to get residents down under without having to detour so to speak through SFO or LAX.
Let’s ignore the negative comments about Alaska moving planes around. Let’s just thank them for bailing out Hawaiian. The articles that talk down the changing of the prior business model Hawaiian operated needs to consider that business model is partially responsible for them circling the bankruptcy drain. Many jobs were saved, access to Hawaii is not going away. This should play out with more pluses than negatives. While I agree SEA does not have ample space for widebodies, they’ll make the tough decisions to determine what makes more financial sense; use multiple gates for one large aircraft or use 3 gates for 3 planes. They’ll figure it out.
Am I dumb? Why do I fear Alaska will mean higher prices for Hawaii flights in the long run? Right now, there may be deals, but what about next year and the year after? This isn’t looking great.
Everyone is bemoaning the 737 but when it comes to leg room I have always found Alaska much more comfortable than Hawaiian, even with their wide body planes. Therefore, given the option, I favored Alaska.
The airfare sale is a nice perk, but it feels more like a distraction from the fact that nonstop flights to Hawaii are no doubt disappearing.
I want to keep thinking that Honolulu will become a exciting hub for more international flights. It seems to open up so many new possibilities. Not sure this will come to pass but I sure hope it does.
I’ve flown Alaska to Hawaii recently, and while the connections in Seattle are okay, the layovers can add a lot of wear and tear, especially with our kids.
Alaska’s smart, but as someone who flies from Hawaii frequently, I really would miss the widebody planes Hawaiian uses. It’s just not the same experience.
The $390 fare is enticing, but I’m more worried we’ll lose the convenience of direct flights to Hawaii. Connecting through Seattle sounds like a bummer.
I’ll be immediately booking future mainland travel to the West Coast ASAP with my points, I’m not going to risk being diverted to Seattle, versus traditional non-stop to SFO/OAK/SJC/SMF. Additionaly, this will be a huge failure for Alaska not to use the recently equipped Starlink A321’s. I’m already hearing from executive colleagues that have relied on this to enjoy Hawaii, but still run their companies and businesses. Will Alaska screw this up like they did Virgin America?